Appeal No. 2002-0970
Application 09/181,814
Molitor also would not have suggested such a ball to one of
ordinary skill in the art, it fails to establish a prima facie
case of either anticipation or obviousness with respect to the
subject matter recited in independent claims 1 and 11.4
Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
rejection and the alternative 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of
claims 1 and 11, and dependent claims 2 through 10 and 12, as
being anticipated by or obvious over Molitor.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007