The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 26 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MASAO YOSHIKAWA and TAKEHISA MINOWA ____________ Appeal No. 2002-1808 Application No. 09/028,059 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 and 3 to 9, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Claim 2 has been canceled. The appellants’ invention relates to an abrasive-bladed or in particular, to a diamond-bladed multiple cutting wheel assembly (specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants’ brief.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007