Ex Parte YOSHIKAWA et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   

                                                                             Paper No.  26                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   

                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
                            Ex parte MASAO YOSHIKAWA and  TAKEHISA MINOWA                                     
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                             Appeal No. 2002-1808                                             
                                           Application No. 09/028,059                                         
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before ABRAMS, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
            CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 and           
            3 to 9, which are all of the claims pending in this application.  Claim 2 has been                
            canceled.                                                                                         
                   The appellants’ invention relates to an abrasive-bladed or in particular, to a             
            diamond-bladed multiple cutting wheel assembly (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the              
            claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants’ brief.                        









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007