Appeal No. 2002-1808 Page 6 Application No. 09/028,059 18 USPQ2d 1089, 1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991) and In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425, 208 USPQ 871, 881 (CCPA 1981). As there is no teaching or suggestion for a grinding wheel with the Young’s modulus recited in the claims, we will not sustain the rejection of claim 1 or claims 3 through 9 dependent thereon. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED NEAL E. ABRAMS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JENNIFER D. BAHR ) Administrative Patent Judge ) mec/vshPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007