Appeal No. 2002-1992 Application 09/206,170 provides optimal cleaning ability with minimal degradation of the semiconductor surface” (col. 12, lines 49-52). The examiner’s reason for combining Chen and Grieger is that “[i]t would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use the wash process set forth by Grieger after the chemical- mechanical polish of the Chen method in order to remove undesirable polish residue including metallic surface contamination” (answer, page 4). This reasoning does not include an explanation as to why that combination would have produced the claimed method wherein a sufficient amount of dielectric material is removed from the open dielectric field to prevent or substantially reduce formation and/or growth of Cu or Cu alloy dendrites from the Cu or Cu alloy lines into the open dielectric field. The examiner asserts that preventing or substantially reducing dendrite formation flows naturally from the suggestion of the prior art (answer, page 7), but provides no supporting evidence or technical reasoning. The examiner argues (answer, page 9): “Grieger teaches the removal of surface dielectric material and surface contamination (column 10) which would reduce the formation of concentrations of surface contamination such as copper dendrites. As is disclosed in the appellants[’] application it is the presence of copper 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007