Interference No. 104,318
Carlson v. Wald
involved Patent No. 5,794,852, it is now time appropriate to
enter adverse judgment against the junior party .3
It is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Counts 1-6
is herein entered against junior party ROBIN CARLSON;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party ROBIN CARLSON is not
entitled to claim 28 of his involved application which
corresponds to Count 1, claim 33 of his involved application
which corresponds to Count 2, claim 29 of his involved
application which corresponds to Count 3, claim 30 of his
involved application which corresponds to Count 4, claim 31 of
his involved application which corresponds to Count 5, and claim
32 of his involved application which corresponds to Count 6;
FURTHER ORDERED that any and all pending motions or requests
filed by the junior party in this interference, which have not
yet been decided, are herein dismissed in light of withdrawal of
the same by the common assignee in Paper No. 66 filed on
April 15, 2002; and
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties should note that failure to
file a copy of any agreement regarding the termination of this
3 The junior party did not contact the judge to which this
case is assigned to raise any objection to the orders contained
in Paper No. 65 regarding the making of an.election by the common
assignee. An opportunity for the junior party to call the judge
at a certain time was provided in Paper No. 65.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007