Interference 104,530
Jurgenson v. Dunfield
Each party filed a brief regarding issue 1 and a separate
brief regarding issue 2. Each party filed a response regarding
issue 1 and a separate response regarding issue 2.
B. Findings of Fact
Background
1. Jurgenson is involved on the basis of Patent 5,657,188,
granted 12 August 1997, based on application 08/457,432, filed 1
June 1995.
2. Dunfield is involved on the basis of application
09/160,593, filed 25 September 1998.
3. Dunfield has been accorded benefit for the purpose of
priority of application 08/438,091, filed 8 May 19951.
4. The interfering subject matter pertains to a disk drive
suspension with a microactuator positioned on a rigid region of a
load beam.
5. Count 1 of the interference is as follows:
Claim 40 of Dunfield
or
Claim 1 of Jurgenson
6. Dunfield claim 40 is as follows:
A disc drive suspension, including:
1
1 Dunfield’s involved application is a continuation of the
08/438,091 application.
- 4 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007