Interference 104,530
Jurgenson v. Dunfield
Claim 41 of Dunfield
or
Claim 17 of Jurgenson
9. Dunfield claim 41 is as follows:
A magnetic disk drive suspension, including:
an actuator arm having a proximal and a distal end;
a mounting region on the proximal end of the
actuator arm;
a rigid load beam integral with the distal end of
the actuator arm;
a gimbal coupled to the rigid load beam;
an air bearing coupled to the gimbal, the air
bearing being configured for receiving a read/write
head; and
an electromagnetic microactuator including at least
two coils mounted on the rigid load beam but not on the
gimbal and coupled to the air bearing, the coils
generating magnetic fields in response to tracking
control signals and finely positioning the air bearing
relative to the rigid load beam and to a track on a
disk.
10. Jurgenson claim 17 is as follows:
A magnetic disk drive suspension, including:
a load beam having a rigid region, proximal and
distal ends, and a spring region between the proximal
end and the rigid region;
a mounting region on the proximal end of the load
beam;
- 6 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007