Meza prepared the letter on 18 December 1991 (Paper 24 at 17).
In support of its argument, Chern directs us to the letter Meza
sent to Micron regarding the 91-095 draft application (Ex. 2017).
The letter by itself, however, does not indicate that Meza
worked on the application for substantial parts of every working
day from 6 December 1991 until 18 December 1991. The letter
merely indicates that Meza sent a draft application to Micron.
Meza does not testify that he was working on the 91-095
application during the time of 6 December 1991 until 18 December
1991. Chern fails to direct us to evidence that indicates that
Meza was working on the 91-095 application, or indeed, that Meza
Was doing anything from 6 December 1991 until 18 December 1991.
There is also a gap of time from when Meza completed the
final draft of '339 on 14 February 1992 until "on or about" 24
February 1992, when Wen-Foo Chern received the final application
for execution. Chern argues that on 17 February 1992, Meza had a
conference call with a Micron representative regarding the '339
application (Finding 41(nn)). Meza does not testify as to the
conference call. Chern relies solely on the billing records for
'339 that indicate that a call took place between Meza and
J. Smith on 17 February 1992. Assuming that a call was made to
discuss the status of '339, there is no account for the other
nine days, or the rest of the time on 17 February 1992.
These two additional gaps alone may not '-e enough to
conclude that Chern failed to sufficiently demonstrate that it
29 -
Page: Previous 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007