Ex Parte IMAMURA et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 1997-0897                                                        
          Application No. 08/227,992                                 Page 2           

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants’ invention relates to an image sensor and optical           
          character reader.  An understanding of the invention can be                 
          derived from a reading of exemplary claim 12, which is reproduced           
          as follows:                                                                 
               12.  An image sensor, comprising:                                      
               a frame, including an opening, for housing said image                  
          sensor;                                                                     
               optical means for irradiating light on and receiving light             
          reflected by a document;                                                    
               focal length changing means, including a transparent                   
          covering, for changing a focal length formed by said frame, and             
          said transparent covering, and said optical means by changing a             
          thickness of said transparent covering above the top portion of             
          said frame, along a light receiving axis of said image sensor.              
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Rhodes                    434,807                 Aug. 19, 1890             
          Koch                    3,825,938                 Jul. 23, 1974             
               Claims 1, 2, 13, and 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101           
          as inoperative and therefore lacking utility.                               
               Claims 1-5, 12-15, 20-23, and 25-27 stand rejected under 35            
          U.S.C. § 101 on the basis that the invention as now claimed lacks           
          utility.                                                                    







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007