Appeal No. 1997-3729 15
Application No. 08/362,107
the results on Table IV is not persuasive for the same reasons stated supra in regard to our
discussion of the rejection under § 103(a). Accordingly, the rejection of the examiner is
sustained.
DECISION
The rejection of claims 1, 2, 6 through 13 and 17 through under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Takada in view of Lok, Fuji, MacIntyre or Shuto is
affirmed.
The rejection of claims 1, 2, 6 through 13 and 17 through 23 under the judicially
created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over the
claims of U. S. Patent Nos. 5,726,005 and 5,736,310 in view of Lok, Fuji, MacIntyre or
Shuto is affirmed.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may
be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007