Ex Parte BIERL et al - Page 3



            Appeal No. 1998-1157                                                    
            Application 08/278,782                                                  
                 Claims 1-17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                
            unpatentable over Drehman.                                              
                 Appellants have grouped the appealed claims as follows:            
            (1) claims 1-3, 5-7, 9, 13, 15-17, 21, (2) claims 4, 8, 10,             
            12, 14 and (3) claims 18-20 (as noted above, claims 18-20               
            have been indicated as allowable).                                      
                 With respect to claim 21, as indicated, supra, the                 
            rejection of claim 21 has been withdrawn, and therefore is              
            not part of group (1).  Hence, group (1) includes claims 1-             
            3, 5-7, 9, 13, and 15-17.  With respect to group (3),                   
            because these claims have been indicated as allowable, we               
            need not consider this grouping.                                        
                 Hence, with respect to groups (1) and (2), we select               
            the broadest claim from each of these groups for                        
            consideration on appeal, as follows:                                    
                 (1) claim 1                                                        
                 (2) claim 8                                                        
            See 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7)(1997).                                         
                 We refer to the brief and reply brief, and to the                  
            answer and supplemental answer, for a complete exposition of            
            the opposing viewpoints expressed by appellants and by the              
            examiner concerning the above-noted rejection.                          
                                     OPINION                                        
                 For the reasons expressed by the examiner and the                  
            reasons set forth below, we will sustain the rejection of               
            claims 1-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over                  
            Drehman.                                                                

                                         3                                          


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007