Appeal No. 1998-1278 Application No. 08/603,186 that Sartori also is the closest prior art since it teaches using a combination of a corrosion inhibitor and the claimed specific sterically hindered amine absorbent. Secondly, the showing is not reasonably commensurate in scope of the claimed subject matter. See In re Grasselli, 713 F.2d 731, 743, 218 USPQ 769, 778 (Fed. Cir. 1983); In re Clemens, 622 F.2d 1029, 1035, 206 USPQ 289, 296 (CCPA 1980). While the showing is drawn to using a few specific absorbents with or without a specific amount of cupric carbonate, the claims on appeal are not so limited. On this record, the appellants have not demonstrated that such showing is predictive of the entire scope of the claimed subject matter. Under the circumstances recounted above, we determine that the evidence of obviousness, on balance, outweighs the evidence of nonobviousness. Hence, we conclude that the claimed subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the applied prior art references. Accordingly, we affirm the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 4 through 10 and 12 through 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007