The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JURGEN HERRMANN and WERNER REINHART
__________
Appeal No. 1998-2673
Application 08/557,1381
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
We commence by stating our understanding that the sole
issue before us for review is the propriety of the examiner’s
rejection of claims 19, 21, 30 and 31 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
1 Filed November 16, 1995, which is a 35 U.S.C. § 371
filing of PCT Application No. PCT/DE94/01185, filed October 6,
1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007