Appeal No. 1998-3126 17
Application No. 08/479,569
We note that the examiner does not rely upon Microsoft alone
for a teaching of triggering help from a video teleconferencing
application window. Ludwig is relied upon for a teaching of
video teleconferencing. Nor does the examiner rely upon
Microsoft for the feature of providing audio/video multimedia
help as required by claim 29. As discussed, supra, with respect
to claim 54, Reed suggests this feature. In addition, we are not
persuaded by appellants' assertion that Microsoft does not
separate data files associated with selectable topics for the
reasons discussed, supra, with respect to claim 56.
However, we find that none of the references are directed to
a multimedia documentation system for a video teleconferencing
workstation. Nor do we find any teaching or suggestion for the
claimed video teleconferencing documentation function. We agree
with appellants (brief, page 11) that Ludwig does not mention a
particular user interface scheme. Accordingly, we agree with
appellants (reply brief, pages 2 and 3) that the references fail
to suggest triggering audio and video documentation help from a
video teleconference application window. We find that the
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007