Appeal No. 1998-3126 19
Application No. 08/479,569
Bluthgen. Accordingly, the rejection of claims 29, 31-37, 39,
42, 43, and 51-53 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
We turn next to claims 16-22 and 25, and 26 . Appellants2
present specific arguments with respect to independent claim 16.
Accordingly, we consider independent claim 16 to be
representative of the group. The examiner's position (answer,
pages 5-7) is that Ludwig does not teach the claimed specific
system documentation. The examiner further asserts that Ludwig
does not teach user selectable functions associated with topic
fields. The examiner additionally asserts that Ludwig does not
teach audio and video data files stored as separate serial
packets accessible by computer workstations. To overcome these
deficiencies in Ludwig, the examiner turns to Microsoft for a
teaching of system documentation. The examiner additionally
turns to Reed for a teaching of user selectable functions
associated with topic fields. The examiner additionally turns to
Bluthgen for a teaching of audio and video data files stored in
separate serial packets accessible by the workstation.
Appellants assert (brief, page 11) that independent claim 16 adds
Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007