Appeal No. 1999-0865 Application No. 08/468,573 terminal to a power supply line as required by claim 57. In making this assertion, Appellants offer an interpretation which concludes that in addition to first and second terminals which are capacitively coupled to ground, Fessenden requires additional terminals, i.e., third and fourth terminals in Appellants’ terminology, for coupling to a power supply line. According to Appellants, it is these “third” or “fourth” terminals to which Fessenden’s power supply line is connected, and not to the first terminal as claimed. After careful review of the Fessenden reference in light of the arguments of record, however, we are in agreement with the Examiner’s position as stated in the Answer. Our interpretation of the disclosure of Fessenden coincides with that of the Examiner, i.e., a connection does in fact exist between the power supply and a first terminal (which Appellants call a “third” terminal) of the antenna. As pointed out by the Examiner (Answer, page 5), this connection is present even if it is effected by inductive coupling. It is further our view that even assuming, arguendo, that Appellants are correct in their contention that any connection between Fessenden’s first antenna 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007