Appeal No. 1999-1158
Application No. 08/687,427
Thus, the examiner’s proposed combination of references would
not have resulted in the here claimed glass transition
temperature.
In summary, none of the section 103 rejections advanced by
the examiner on this appeal can be sustained because in each of
these rejections the applied prior art contains no teaching or
suggestion of the polymer glass transition temperature feature
required by the here claimed method.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007