Ex Parte RUSSELL et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                                                                                    Paper No. 23              



                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                __________                                                    

                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                    
                             Ex parte THOMAS RUSSELL, JAMES C. HUDSON,                                        
                           WALLACE H. COULTER, CARLOS M. RODRIGUEZ and                                        
                                           CONSTANCE M. HAJEK                                                 
                                                ___________                                                   
                                            Appeal No. 1999-1397                                              
                                         Application No. 08/303,924                                           
                                                __________                                                    
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                __________                                                    



            Before SCHEINER, MILLS and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
            SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134 from the final rejection of claims 129             
            through 132 and 134 through 140, the only claims remaining in the application.                    


                                                                                                             







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007