Ex parte BERG et al. - Page 4




                 Appeal No. 1999-1563                                                                                                                   
                 Application 08/509,619                                                                                                                 


                          Claim 4, 10, 16 and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                                                     
                 as being unpatentable over Lemon when taken with Nguyen.                                                                               
                          Claims 7, 13, 19 and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                                                                        
                 103 as being unpatentable over Lemon when taken with Maeurer.                                                                          
                          Claims 20, 21, 23 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                                                                       
                 103 as being unpatentable over Lemon when taken with Shing.                                                                            


                          Claim 22 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                                                           
                 unpatentable over Lemon when taken with Shing and Nguyen.                                                                              




                          Claim 25 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                                                           
                 unpatentable over Lemon when taken with Shing and Maeurer.                                                                             


                          Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the                                                                     
                 Examiner, reference is made to the Brief  and Examiner's                7                                                              
                 Answer , for the respective details thereof.8                                                                                                                           
                                                                     OPINION                                                                            


                          7The Brief was received October 9, 1998.                                                                                      
                          8Mailed October 27, 1998.                                                                                                     
                                                                           4                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007