Ex Parte CLARKE et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                                 Paper No. 19         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                               Ex parte PETER J. CLARKE                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-2122                                 
                               Application No. 08/564,659                             
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before GARRIS, TIMM, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.         
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection               
          of claims 103-179 which are all of the claims remaining in the              
          application.                                                                
          The subject matter on appeal relates to an apparatus and to a               
          method for providing a deposition on a planar substrate.  This              
          appealed subject matter is adequately illustrated by independent            
          claims 103 and 124 and dependent claims 104, 105, 125 and 126.  A           
          copy of these claims, taken from the Appellant’s brief is appended          
          to this decision.                                                           







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007