Ex Parte CORNELL et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                               Paper No. 28           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte KEVIN H. CORNELL,                               
                                 JOSEPH C. TOPPING,                                   
                                         and                                          
                                 THADDEUS J. SZYNAL                                   
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-2241                                  
                             Application No. 08/714,914                               
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before PAK, DELMENDO, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from             
          the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 21 and 33 through 40 in              










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007