Ex Parte CORNELL et al - Page 8


          Appeal No. 1999-2241                                                        
          Application No. 08/714,914                                                  


               according to claim 30, wherein the primary container                   
               body and any end cap or caps present in the free-                      
               fluoride-ion-sensitive electrode are constituted of                    
               polytetrafluoroethylene and the first and second                       
               elastomeric gaskets are constructed of a copolymer of                  
               tetrafluoroethylene and perfluoro(methylvinylether).                   
                    40.  A free-fluoride-ion-sensitive electrode                      
               according to claim 21, wherein the primary container                   
               body and any end cap or caps present in the free-                      
               fluoride-ion-sensitive electrode have a modulus of                     
               elasticity in flexure from 1.0 x 10  to 5.0 x 10  kg/m7           7     2                
               and the first and second elastomeric gaskets are                       
               constructed of a fluorocarbon elastomer.                               
               The examiner relies on the following prior art references as           
          evidence of unpatentability:                                                
          Frant                    3,431,182                Mar. 4, 1969              
          Bukamier                 4,128,468                Dec. 5, 1978              
               Claims 33 through 40 on appeal stand rejected under 35                 
          U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite.  (Examiner's           
          answer, page 4.)  Further, claims 21 and 40 on appeal stand                 
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the                  
          combined teachings of Frant and Bukamier.  (Id. at page 3.)                 
               We reverse the examiner's rejection under the second                   
          paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 but affirm the rejection under 35              










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007