Ex Parte SUGIYAMA et al - Page 1



                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           

                                                                                           Paper No. 25                 

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                    __________                                                          

                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                     __________                                                         
                                         Ex parte YOSHIHIRO SUGIYAMA,                                                   
                                               and YOSHIAKI NAKATA                                                      
                                                    ___________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 1999-2580                                                    
                                             Application No. 08/753,598                                                 
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                HEARD: July 11, 2002                                                    
                                                     __________                                                         
              Before KRASS, BARRETT, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       
                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decidsion on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3-12 and 14-34,                
              all of the pending claims.                                                                                
                     The invention is directed to a quantum semiconductor device and method of                          
              making the same, wherein the semiconductor device includes quantum dots.  It is                           
              alleged that the instant invention is based on the discovery that the freely grown                        
              quantum dots cause a deformation when an intermediate layer having a thickness                            
              smaller than the height of the freely grown quantum dots is formed so as to cover the                     
              freely grown quantum dots.  As a result of the deformation of the intermediate layer, the                 
              vertically aligned quantum dots cause a strong quantum mechanical coupling that                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007