Patent Interference No. 103,925 Page 3
Accordingly, JUDGMENT as to the subject matter of the count in issue is hereby
awarded to Miller et al., the junior party, and against Aviv et al., the senior party.
Accordingly, Aviv et al., the senior party is not entitled to their application containing
claim 13 corresponding to Count 1 and Miller et al., the junior party, is entitled to their
application containing claims 31-32, 34-35, 37-38, 40-41 and 57 corresponding to
Count 1.
ANDREW H. METZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
WILLIAM F. PATE, III ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
HUBERT C. LORIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007