BUCHWALD et al v. COLLINS et al v. DRUMM et al v. IANNUZZI et al v. KEREM et al v. RIORDAN et al v. ROMMENS et al v. TSUI - Page 20




                  Interference Nos. 103,882, 103,933, and 104,228                                          Consolidated Judgment                          
                  Gregory v. Tsui et al.                                                                                      Page 20                     
                  609 application was held to be insufficient to be a constructive reduction to practice such that                                        
                  Gregory is now senior.  Collins has provided no alternative basis for ruling in its favor.                                              
                           In the 228 interference, the 609 application is sufficient, but Tsui is the senior party20 and                                 
                  thus must prevail absent a compelling reason to the contrary.  Riordan provided no such reason.                                         
                           E.       Other motions                                                                                                         
                           Gregory's motion to suppress the Ray declaration is dismissed as moot since we do not                                          
                  rely on it to Gregory's detriment.                                                                                                      
                           Gregory's motion to change inventorship (933 Paper No. 37) is dismissed as moot.                                               
                  Gregory can fix any remaining problem during further ex parte proceedings.  There is no pending                                         
                  motion for invalidity (35 U.S.C. 102(f)) against any of Gregory's claims.  Since Tsui has opposed                                       
                  any change in inventorship, it appears to accede to the adequacy of the status quo.  This dismissal                                     
                  does not change that status quo.  Moreover, no testimony has been submitted for consideration on                                        
                  this disputed matter.  Given the great age of these interferences and the prejudice to the public of                                    
                  any further effective term extension for any resulting patent to resolve the issue would be an                                          
                  exercise in absurdity.  Absent a related actively contested issue (e.g., § 102(f) or availability for                                   
                  corroboration), a mistake in inventorship is viewed as easily cured.  Canon Computer Sys., Inc.                                         
                  v. Nu-Kote Int'l, Inc., 134 F.3d 1085, 1089, 45 USPQ2d 1355, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 1998).                                                     
                           Collin's motion to change inventorship is also dismissed as moot.  All of its claims                                           
                  corresponded to the 933 count and those claims are canceled by operation of this judgment.                                              


                           20  It is not clear why Riordan is not the senior party to Tsui.  37 C.F.R. § 1.601(m).  Riordan, however, never               
                  raised the issue during the course of the interference.  Presumably Riordan had good reason not to raise the issue.  We                 
                  will not further delay the proceeding by raising it sua sponte now.                                                                     





Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007