Interference Nos. 103,882, 103,933, and 104,228 Consolidated Judgment Gregory v. Tsui et al. Page 22 FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to 882 Count 1 is awarded against junior party Gregory; FURTHER ORDERED that Gregory is not entitled to a patent claiming the subject matter of claims 10-12 of Gregory's 08/311,665 application, which correspond to 882 Count 1; FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to 933 Count 1 is awarded against junior party Collins and senior party Tsui; FURTHER ORDERED that Collins is not entitled to a patent claiming the subject matter of claims 1-16 of Collin's 5,240,846 patent, which correspond to 933 Count 1; FURTHER ORDERED that Tsui is not entitled to a patent claiming the subject matter of claims 98, 99, and 101-110 of Tsui's 08/252,778 application, which correspond to 933 Count 1; FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to 228 Count 1 is awarded against junior party Gregory and junior party Riordan; FURTHER ORDERED that Gregory is not entitled to a patent claiming the subject matter of claims 1, 3, and 7 of Gregory's 08/470,534 application, which correspond to 228 Count 1; FURTHER ORDERED that Riordan is not entitled to a patent claiming the subject matter of claims 1-13 of Riordan's 5,543,399 patent, which correspond to 228 Count 1; FURTHER ORDERED that the preliminary statements be returned; and FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be given a paper number and be entered in the administrative records of Gregory's 08/311,665, 08/087,132, and 08/470,534Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007