The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel Box Interference Filed: November 1, 2002 Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ SATOSHI TAKECHI Junior Party (U.S. Application 08/800,227), v. BRIAN GOODALL, SAIKUMAR JAYARAMAN, ROBERT SHICK, LARRY RHODES Senior Party (U.S. Application 09/630,894) _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,785 _______________ Before: SPIEGEL, TIERNEY and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge. FINAL JUDGMENT The parties have reached an agreement regarding the issues presented in this interference. Specifically, both Takechi and Goodall have filed proposed amendments. Contingent upon entry of the amendments, Goodall has conceded priority to Takechi with respect to Goodall, U.S. Application No. 09/630,894 claims 3, 4 and 17-22. (Goodall Contingent Concession of Priority,Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007