Interference No. 104,785
Page No. 6
FURTHER ORDERED that Takechi Revised Proposed Amendment (Paper No. 28) be
entered into Takechi, U.S. Application No. 08/800,227.
FURTHER ORDERED that priority of invention for the subject matter recited in claims
3, 4 and 17-22 of Goodall et al, U.S. Application No. 09/630,894 (See, Goodall Clean Copy of
Claims, Paper No. 12) is awarded against Senior Party Goodall.
FURTHER ORDERED that Goodall is not entitled to a patent containing claims 3, 4
and 17-22 of Goodall et al., U.S. Application No. 09/630,894.
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this final decision shall be placed and given a
paper number in the file of Goodall et al., U.S. Application No. 09/630,894 and Takechi, U.S.
Application No. 08/800,227.
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are reminded of the provisions of 35 U.S.C.
§ 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661.
CAROL A. SPIEGEL )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL P. TIERNEY ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
MARK NAGUMO )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007