Appeal No. 2000-1852
Application No. 08/924,856
Assuming, arguendo, that it would have been obvious to
utilize the multiple camera view of Beamish in Christian’s system
for navigating a robot, as held by the Examiner, the combination
of references would still not disclose the mounting of three
video cameras on three mutually perpendicular axises. In that
regard, Beamish only supplies what appears to be multiple views
by multiple cameras which are capable of movement about two
perpendicular axis. Accordingly, as the Examiner has failed to
establish a prima facie case of obviousness, the 35 U.S.C. § 103
rejection of claims 7 and 9 cannot be sustained.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007