Ex Parte TRIKA et al - Page 1




                                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                          
                                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                                                                                                            Paper No. 19               

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                          
                                                             ____________                                                              
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                           
                                                       AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                             ____________                                                              
                                       Ex parte SANJEEV N. TRIKA and JOHN I. GARNEY                                                    
                                                             ____________                                                              
                                                        Appeal No. 2000-2138                                                           
                                                      Application No. 08/935,314                                                       
                                                             ____________                                                              
                                                               ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                             ____________                                                              
               Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                        
               HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  



                                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 15.                                              
                       The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus for generating a stereoscopic                         
               sequence of frames.  Each frame in the sequence has a left image and a right image, and one of the                      
               left image and the right image is an approximation of the other.  If a pixel is not filled in the                       
               approximation image, then the method and apparatus assigns the data values of a corresponding                           
               pixel in an image from a preceding frame to the pixel that is not filled in the approximation image.                    
                       Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007