The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PAUL CHOW, ALLEN J. PORTER, DAVID A. STRASSER, ANTONIO ASARO, INDRA LAKSONO, and BILJANA D. SIMSIC ____________ Appeal No. 2001-0513 Application No. 09/096,550 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 23, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Appellants' invention relates to a method and apparatus for decompressing compressed data, including video data that has been compressed in accordance with the MPEG 2 standard. The process involves retrieving components from a non-local memory at a rate that is independent of the rate in which the components werePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007