The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DIANE C. BOYD, STUART M. BURNS, HUSSEIN I. HANAFI,
YUAN TAUR and WILLIAM C. WILLE
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0555
Application No. 09/026,093
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before LALL, DIXON, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-13, claims 14-39
having been non-elected.
According to Appellants (brief at pages 3 and 4), the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007