Appeal No. 2001-0555 Application No. 09/026,093 regions do not show an abrupt region between the vertical walls and the source and drain region, the resulting abruptness of the region between the vertical wall and the source or the drain must be the same as claimed by Appellants, since the process of manufacture disclosed in Liu is the same as the process described in the specification of Appellants (figures 3A-3L). Appellants strongly argue (brief at pages 3-6) that the process disclosed by Appellants is different from the process disclosed by Liu, and the Examiner’s position that the Liu’s process results in the claimed structure is without any justification. We are of the view that just because Liu’s process of manufacturing a MOSFET comprises the same basic process steps such as selective etching and the depositing of a mask etc., that does not constitute that the two processes are identical. Therefore, the Examiner has not met the burden of showing that the two processes are indeed identical and will result in the same final structure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007