Ex Parte BOYD et al - Page 6



          Appeal No. 2001-0555                                                        
          Application No. 09/026,093                                                  

          regions do not show an abrupt region between the vertical walls             
          and the source and drain region, the resulting abruptness of the            
          region between the vertical wall and the source or the drain                
          must be the same as claimed by Appellants, since the process of             
          manufacture disclosed in Liu is the same as the process described           
          in the specification of Appellants (figures 3A-3L).                         
               Appellants strongly argue (brief at pages 3-6) that the                
          process disclosed by Appellants is different from the process               
          disclosed by Liu, and the Examiner’s position that the Liu’s                
          process results in the claimed structure is without any                     
          justification.                                                              
               We are of the view that just because Liu’s process of                  
          manufacturing a MOSFET comprises the same basic process steps               
          such as selective etching and the depositing of a mask etc., that           
          does not constitute that the two processes are identical.                   
          Therefore, the Examiner has not met the burden of showing that              
          the two processes are indeed identical and will result in the               
          same final structure.                                                       











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007