The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GUY DUPENLOUP
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0571
Application No. 09/026,790
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1-6 and 9-20, which are all
of the claims pending in this application.
BACKGROUND
Appellant’s invention relates to automatic synthesis script
generation for a synopsis design compiler. An understanding of
the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1,
which is reproduced as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007