Appeal No. 2001-0594 Application No. 08/929,153 appellant’s arguments, the examiner offers no rebuttal in the response section of the answer. Accordingly, we also will not sustain the rejection of claims 25 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. 102(e). The examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-19, 21-23, 25 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) is reversed. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) ERROL A. KRASS ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) -10–Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007