Ex Parte GHOSAL et al - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2001-0742                                                        
          Application 09/128,912                                                      



          See Appeal Brief, Paper No. 13, received March 3, 2000, page 2.             
                    The polymer latex composition comprises about                     
                    5 to about 65 weight percent of an aromatic                       
                    vinyl monomer; about 35 to about 90 weight                        
                    percent of a conjugated diene monomer; and                        
                    about 0.5 to about 10 weight percent of a                         
                    component selected from the group consisting                      
                    of an unsaturated acid monomer, a partial                         
                    ester of an unsaturated polycarboxylic acid                       
                    monomer, and mixtures thereof.                                    
          Id.                                                                         
          According to appellants, crosslinking of the film is manipulated            
          such that articles formed therefrom possess the physical                    
          properties of strength and elongation as well as aesthetic                  
          features such as softness and comfort which are related to the              
          modulus.  Id.  A particular advantage of the invention is that              
          articles made from the crosslinked film do not include natural              
          rubber, since many individuals are allergic to natural rubber               
          proteins.  Id.                                                              

                                     DISCUSSION                                       
                         Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                          
                    Anticipation requires the disclosure, in a single prior           
          art reference, of each element of the claim under consideration.            
          See W.L. Gore & Assocs. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1554,              
          220 USPQ 303, 313 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851              

                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007