Ex Parte GHOSAL et al - Page 9




          Appeal No. 2001-0742                                                        
          Application 09/128,912                                                      



                           Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103                            
                    In rejecting claims 16-26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the              
          examiner relies on Kolb as disclosing articles formed from the              
          claimed crosslinked film and relies on Schwinum as teaching a               
          molding technique for manufacturing gloves.  Examiner’s Answer,             
          page 9.  Buchheim and Szczechura are relied on as teaching                  
          laminating or coating latex gloves with, for example, a powder.             
          See id.  As discussed above in connection with the rejections               
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), we have concluded that none of the                
          cited references disclose the claimed crosslinked film.                     
          Moreover, the examiner has failed to explain why one of ordinary            
          skill in the art would have been motivated to modify the film               
          disclosed in Kolb or any of the other references to achieve a               
          crosslinked film having the recited properties of claims 8 and              
          17.                                                                         











                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007