Appeal No. 2001-0742 Application 09/128,912 Appellants urge that despite the fact that the polymeric compositions of the references may be similar to appellants’ composition, the claimed films are not the same as those of the cited references, because “the composition of a latex polymer clearly does not solely dictate final physical end properties of crosslinked films made therefrom.” Appeal Brief, page 4. In particular, appellants note that the extent of latex film crosslinking is due to a number of factors such as gel content, swell area, etc. which are dependent upon processing temperature, extent of conversion, rate of reaction, polymer concentration, catalyst concentration, etc. Id. Appellants further note that film performance properties are influenced during the inherent stage of polymer formation as well as during post polymerization crosslinking, which is influenced by factors such as cure additives. Id. In support of their position, appellants reference three separate articles which were submitted with appellants’ amendment received December 9, 1999, Paper No. 9. Appellants rely on these articles as proof that the properties of latex polymers are determined by variables other than composition alone. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007