Ex Parte WUGOFSKI - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 16              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                            Ex parte THEODORE D. WUGOFSKI                             
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2001-1135                                  
                               Application 09/002,733                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 1 through 16, all the claims present in the application.             
               The present invention is directed to a convergence system              
          that displays channel banners that assume the same form                     
          regardless of the source.  See page 3 of Appellant’s                        
          specification.                                                              


                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007