Appeal No. 2001-1135
Application 09/002,733
quoting In re Rouffet, 149 F.3d 1350, 1359, 47 USPQ2d 1453, 1459
(Fed. Cir. 1998). “[T]he Board must not only assure that the
requisite findings are made, based on evidence of record, but
must also explain the reasoning by which the findings are deemed
to support the agency’s conclusion.” Lee, 277 F.3d at 1344, 61
USPQ2d at 1434. With these principles in mind, we commence
review of the pertinent evidence and arguments of Appellant and
Examiner.
Upon our review of LaJoie we find that indeed LaJoie does
teach in column 5, lines 10 through 22, that a comprehensive
channel navigation would enable the cables subscriber to more
easily navigate through the abundance of programming and services
that are available wherein a program information banner may be
displayed whenever the user changes channels. Also we find that
LaJoie teaches in column 6, lines 47 through 68 that LaJoie’s
invention includes a highlighted channel banner.
However, we fail to find that LaJoie teaches that the
highlighted channel banner includes basic field for displaying in
a consistent form regardless of selected sources, wherein the
selected form comprises a same displayed location and format of a
basic field regardless of the selected source. In particular,
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007