Appeal No. 2001-1135
Application 09/002,733
LaJoie teaches that figure 14 is an illustrative screen display
of a general settings menu of a set-top terminal of one
embodiment of the present invention. See column 8, lines 59
through 61 of LaJoie. LaJoie further discloses that figure 14
illustrates all timer setting of the general settings menu. See
column 22, lines 47 through 68 of LaJoie. LaJoie then teaches
another screen display in which the fields are completely
different in figure 20. Figure 20 is an illustrative screen
display of the theme mode of an interactive program guide of a
set-top terminal. See column 9, lines 8 through 10 and column
26, lines 48 through 68, of LaJoie. Finally, LaJoie teaches a
completely different screen with completely different field
layouts in figure 29. Although LaJoie teaches that figure 29 is
a screen display of an impulse pay-per-view. See column 9, lines
21 through 24 and column 30, line 54 through column 32, line 7,
of LaJoie. Therefore, we fail to find that the Examiner has
provided substantial evidence that LaJoie teaches or suggests a
basic field for display in consistent form regardless of the
selected source, wherein the consistent form comprises a same
displayed location and format of the basic field regardless of
the selected source as set forth in Appellant’s claims.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007