The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DONALD GEORGE MIKAN, JR.
_____________
Appeal No. 2001-1189
Application No. 08/824,140
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2,
4 through 10, 12 through 18 and 20 through 27.
The disclosed invention relates to a dynamic logic circuit.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it
reads as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007