Ex Parte WIESENFARTH - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2001-1304                                                                                     
             Application No. 09/061,392                                                                               

                                                  BACKGROUND                                                          
                    The disclosed invention is directed to a folded monopole antenna using two                        
             vertical monopole elements, one of which is tapered and resistively loaded to a ground                   
             plane.  According to appellant, the tapered monopole antenna element causes a                            
             cancellation of the electric field from the feeding (non-tapered) antenna element, to                    
             thereby provide a wide range of impedance matching.  Representative claim 1 is                           
             reproduced below.                                                                                        
                    1.     An antenna apparatus comprising:                                                           
                           a first monopole antenna element having an outer diameter that varies                      
                    between a base end thereof and a top end thereof;                                                 
                           a second monopole antenna element having an outer diameter that is                         
                    substantially constant between a base end thereof and a top end thereof, and                      
                           a third antenna element having an outer diameter that is substantially                     
                    equal to said outer diameter of said second monopole antenna element, said                        
                    third antenna element being operably coupled to said top ends of said first and                   
                    second monopole antenna elements.                                                                 
                    The examiner relies on the following references:                                                  
             Saari                              3,229,296                          Jan. 11, 1966                      
             Goodman                            4,161,736                          Jul.  17, 1979                     
                    Claims 1-7 and 10-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                
             unpatentable over Goodman and Saari.                                                                     
                    We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 6) and the Examiner’s Answer (Paper                    
             No. 13) for a statement of the examiner’s position and to the Brief (Paper No. 12) and                   

                                                         -2-                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007