Appeal No. 2001-1304 Application No. 09/061,392 in addition to a substantially vertical monopole element having a non-constant outer diameter. Since we are persuaded by appellant that the prior art applied against the claims is deficient, we do not sustain the section 103 rejection of claims 1-7 and 10-16. CONCLUSION The rejection of claims 1-7 and 10-16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) Administrative Patent Judge ) -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007