Ex Parte CHEEK et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2001-1419                                                        
          Application No. 09/199,960                                                  


                    implanting into the substrate at a second energy level            
               a second concentration of a second dopant species, whereby             
               source and drain regions are formed in the substrate and               
               aligned with the alignment structure;                                  
                    growing an epitaxial layer on the substrate adjacent to           
               the spacers;                                                           
                    removing the polysilicon alignment structure, thereby             
               forming a trench between the spacers;                                  
                    forming a gate dielectric in the trench;                          
                    forming a silicide layer on the epitaxial layer; and              
                    forming a metal gate electrode in the trench, wherein             
               the top of the gate electrode is disposed only over the                
               lightly doped drain regions.                                           
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Rodder et al. (Rodder)        5,198,378           Mar. 30, 1993             
          Stanley Wolf (Wolf), Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, pp.               
          144-51, 157-58 (Lattice Press, Sunset Beach, CA 1990).                      
          A. Chatterjee et al. (Chatterjee), “Sub-100 nm gate length metal            
          gate NMOS transistors fabricated by a replacement gate process,”            
          International Electron Devices Meeting, 1997.  Technical Digest.,           
          Int’l, pp. 33.1.1-33.1.4 (Dec. 1997).                                       
               Claims 9-17 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as being unpatentable over Chatterjee in view of Rodder and Wolf.           








                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007