Appeal No. 2001-1436 Page 15
Application No. 08/422,612
Summary
We reverse the rejection based on Dull, Dietzel, et al., because the cited
references would not have motivated a person skilled in the art to combine their
respective teachings. We reverse the rejection for nonenablement because the
examiner has not shown that making or using the claimed invention would have
required undue experimentation, and we reverse the rejections based on King
because King is not available as prior art.
REVERSED
WILLIAM F. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
DEMETRA J. MILLS )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
ERIC GRIMES )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007