Appeal No. 2001-1570 Application No. 09/081,393 piezoelectric elements 44 cause tabs 47 to undergo deformation during the operation of the microactuator and thus, read on the claimed recitation of “bent tabs” and “bent-up tabs” (answer, page 6). A rejection for anticipation under section 102 requires that the four corners of a single prior art document describe every element of the claimed invention, either expressly or inherently, such that a person of ordinary skill in the art could practice the invention without undue experimentation. See Atlas Powder Co. v. Ireco Inc., 190 F.3d 1342, 1347, 51 USPQ2d 1943, 1947 (Fed. Cir. 1999); In re Paulsen, 30 F.3d 1475, 1478-79, 31 USPQ2d 1671, 1673 (Fed. Cir. 1994). After reviewing Boutaghou, we agree with Appellant’s assertion that the reference includes no teaching or suggestion related to monomorphs made of a metal sheet having bent tabs on which a piezoelectric element is attached. Boutaghou provides for PZT elements 44 which are preferably bi-morph in nature and are bonded to the sides of spokes 47 (column 6, lines 5-13). The Examiner provides no specific reference in Boutaghou related to the use of monomorph elements, nor can we find the necessary teachings in the reference that would have pointed to using such elements. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007