Ex Parte VOGMAN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1627                                                        
          Application No. 09/289,420                                 Page 2           

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellant's invention relates to a DC-DC voltage converter.            
          An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading             
          of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as follows:                       
               1.  A DC-to-DC converter having an input voltage and an                
          output voltage, comprising:                                                 
               a circuit topology such that, in operation, the input and              
          output voltages have the same polarity, and that a magnitude of a           
          ratio of the input voltage to the output voltage of said DC-to-DC           
          converter is capable of being equal to, greater than, or less               
          than one;                                                                   
               said circuit topology being further such that at least one             
          capacitor and alternative coils of a two-coil inductor are                  
          employed in a primary and a secondary circuit loop of said                  
          DC-to-DC converter;                                                         
               said primary and secondary circuit loops not being                     
          electrically isolated.                                                      

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Cuk et al. (Cuk)         4,274,133           June 16, 1981                  
          Bang                     5,621,625           Apr. 15, 1997                  
          Yasumura                 5,835,368           Nov. 10, 1998                  

               Claims 1-31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being           
          clearly anticipated by Yasumura.                                            
               Claims 1-25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being           
          clearly anticipated by Cuk.                                                 









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007