Ex Parte WHITMAN et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1633                                                        
          Application 09/092,543                                                      


          Representative claims 13 and 24 are reproduced as follows:                  
               13. A method for applying a fluid to a silicon wafer surface           
          comprising:                                                                 
               rotating a receiving surface about an axis;                            
               flowing a fluid onto said receiving surface proximate said             
          axis;                                                                       
               projecting an energy stream against an observation location            
          on said receiving surface;                                                  
               monitoring said observation location to gather information             
          about said receiving surface; and                                           
               altering the flow of said fluid to said receiving surface in           
          view of said information.                                                   
               24. A method for applying a fluid to a silicon wafer surface           
          comprising:                                                                 
               rotating a receiving surface about an axis;                            
               dispensing a fluid from a first nozzle adjacent said axis              
          onto said receiving surface;                                                
               monitoring the outward flow of said fluid along said                   
          receiving surface; and                                                      
               dispensing said fluid from a second nozzle onto said                   
          receiving surface when said fluid flows outwardly to a radius               
          from said axis, said second nozzle being remote from said first             
          nozzle.                                                                     
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Ushijima                    5,393,624             Feb. 28, 1995             
          Lin et al. (Lin)            5,646,071             July 08, 1997             
          Claims 13-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                     
          being anticipated by the disclosure of Ushijima.  Claims 1-5, 24-           
          26 and 30-32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence             
          of obviousness the examiner offers Lin in view of Ushijima.                 
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the            
          respective details thereof.                                                 

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007