The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte YAP-PENG TAN
and
TINKU ACHARYA
__________
Appeal No. 2001-1642
Application No. 09/191,310
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and MOORE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-20, which are all the claims of this
application.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAIM
The appellants have indicated (Brief, page 6, last line)
that, for the purposes of this appeal, the claims will stand or
fall together. Consistent with this indication, the appellants
have made no separate arguments with respect to the remaining
claims. Accordingly, all the claims will stand or fall together,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007